Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes:
> * test-suite/tests/00-socket.test:
> * test-suite/tests/alist.test:
> * test-suite/tests/elisp.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-iso88591.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-iso88597.test:
> * test-suite/tests/encoding-utf8.test:
> * test-suite/tests/hash.test:
> * test-suite/tests/i18n.test:
> * test-suite/tests/modules.test:
> * test-suite/tests/ports.test:
> * test-suite/tests/srfi-35.test: Make tests use eqv? instead of eq? when
> comparing numbers, characters. Checked also for similar uses of
> assq[-ref].
>
> * test-suite/tests/vlist.test ("vhash-delete honors HASH"): Change test
> to use eqv-ness, not eq-ness, which should not impact its purpose as
> these two are equivalent for strings.
I think we should apply this patch. Although we can currently rely on
'eq?' working properly for fixnums and characters in Guile, misuse of
'eq?' is widespread, and our misuse of it in our own code contributes to
the confusion. IMO we should set a better example.
What do other people think?
Mark
