Follow-up Comment #1, bug #31445 (project guile):
This is not a regression, as the results would have been the same before 1.9.
But clearly it's not ideal either.
I propose we add new API, scm_call_0_v, scm_apply_3_v, etc. Such code would
truncate or raise an error for 0 values. Then we change all internal users to
use the new code, if appropriate.
WDYT?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?31445>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
