The differences are not significant. I guess I wanted to make clear in the
test case that this isn't something to do with literal rationals, and I
didn't want the test case to be printing things to the console.
Thanks,
Grem
Gregory Marton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi folks,
I just wanted to send in a test case for a bug that is fixed as of
guile 1.8.2, but recently bit me, and it's just not that obvious to
test for. It is essentially exposed in 1.8.1 by
(let ((x 1/2))
(display x)
(equal? x 1/2)) ===> #f !
Thanks, but why the differences between the code above and the patch
below? Are they significant?
--- test-suite/tests/fractions.test.1.8.3 2008-01-25 20:08:57.000000000
-0500
+++ test-suite/tests/fractions.test 2008-01-25 20:09:07.000000000 -0500
@@ -400,3 +400,8 @@
(with-test-prefix "fraction generics"
(testeq (G 1) 'integer)
(testeq (G 2/3) 'fraction))
+
+(pass-if (let ((x (/ 1 2)))
+ (with-output-to-string (lambda () (display x)))
+ (equal? x (/ 1 2))))
+
Regards,
Neil
--
------ __@ Gregory A. Marton http://csail.mit.edu/~gremio/
--- _`\<,_ .
-- (*)/ (*) Let the machine do the dirty work.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~_~~~_~~~~~v~~~~^^^^~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~++~~~~~~~
