Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
Have done. /me foolishly overlooked (guile)Manual Conventions, and drew mental connection to "many typos of if."? :-Shttp://csserver.evansville.edu/~sc87/scheme-data-1S11.patchthe changelog entry neglects to mention some incorrect replacements of "iff" w/ "if". the former is a notational shorthand for "if and only if" (see node "Manual Conventions"). could you correct these and post another patch?
http://csserver.evansville.edu/~sc87/scheme-data-2S11.patch
--
Stephen Compall
Also known as S11001001
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://dotgnu.org
If people don't have to build, they can just snap their fingers and
duplicate them, that's wonderful. But this change in technology
doesn't suit the people who wants to be able to own individual copies
and can get money for individual copies. That's an idea that only fits
conserved objects. So they do their best to render programs like
material objects. Have you wondered why, when you go to the software
store and buy a copy of a program it comes in something that looks
like a book? They want people to think as if they were getting a
material object, not to realize what they have really got in the form
of digital copyable data.
-- RMS, Lecture at KTH (Sweden), 30 October 1986
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
