Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not up-to-date on what you're talking about, but since you mention > removing *one* item, it seems like you should use scm_delq1_x instead > of scm_delq_x. Yep, right. I though scm_delq_x would only remove one item. Wasn't that the case some time ago? I think I remember writing my own verison of delq! because delq! didn't remove all matching elements...
- Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Neil Jerram
- Re: Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Marius Vollmer
- Re: Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Neil Jerram
- Re: Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Marius Vollmer
- Re: Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Mikael Djurfeldt
- Re: Bug in assq/v/oc-remove! primitives (with patch) Neil Jerram
- Marius Vollmer