Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm not up-to-date on what you're talking about, but since you mention
> removing *one* item, it seems like you should use scm_delq1_x instead
> of scm_delq_x.

Yep, right.  I though scm_delq_x would only remove one item.  Wasn't
that the case some time ago?  I think I remember writing my own
verison of delq! because delq! didn't remove all matching elements...

Reply via email to