Follow-up Comment #16, bug #68261 (group groff): To flesh out the history of the text quoted in comment #15:
[comment #15 comment #15:] > inconsistent among implementations if an un-fulfillable selection is > made;[1] The "[1]" footnote reference was left dangling in the groff list message I cited when I originally quoted this text in bug #68543. (The cited message did contain a footnote "[1]," but its antecedent was a different part of the message.) The correct "[1]" reference appeared in http://lists.gnu.org/r/coreutils/2026-05/msg00040.html and reads in full: [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff-commit/2026-04/msg00342.html _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68261> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
