Follow-up Comment #1, bug #66547 (group groff): [comment #0 original submission:] > I have no plans to [support], and there seems to be no demand for, use of > UTF-8 or any other multibyte or wide-character encoding in GNU _troff_ > output.[*] (The only person I've ever heard advocate for this refuses to > contribute to _groff_ and seems to have disappeared from our discussion list > some months or years ago.)
Correction: a second person has requested that: Deri. "I am expecting changes to grout and groff fonts (v2) when you complete full utf8 throughput." https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67992#comment14 However, as noted in that same bug #67992, I do not plan to "complete full utf8 throughput". Also see https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2026-02/msg00035.html. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66547> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
