Follow-up Comment #12, bug #65716 (group groff): The basic question is should we be relying solely on the UCPs in the Adobe Glyph List (which appears to be set in aspic), or should we be patching it so it matches current Unicode standard (which is used by troff).
It is this difference which has caused confusion for our users.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65716>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
