Follow-up Comment #3, bug #66980 (group groff): Hi Dave,
At 2025-04-13T19:45:18-0400, Dave wrote: > Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66980 (group groff): Good to hear from you! I'm relieved and was starting to worry a little. [reorganizing] > An excellent point. So the \[u2026] fallback should be in: > * dvi.tmac > * lbp.tmac Seems reasonable to me. > I am unsure about: > * lj4.tmac Looks to me [https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/tree/font/devlj4/generate/symbol.map?h=1.23.0#n131 like it should be]. > * html.tmac > > I've never used either of these output formats. font/devhtml, in > particular, seems to not even have font description files as the rest > of groff understands them (which would be expected, since an HTML > document has little control over the font coverage provided by > whatever software renders it). Yes, but the same can be said of: > * tty.tmac ...which leaves me a little up in the air about both of these not-really-typesetter devices. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66980> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
