Follow-up Comment #7, bug #65077 (group groff): [comment #6 comment #6:] > A sentence in bug #66442 summarizes the issue more succinctly, I think, than > anything here: > > "activation of no-space mode, after output of \n[DD] space is *not* the > solution to bug #62688, because it inhibits *all* forms of explicitly > user-specified vertical spacing requests, e.g. explicit .sp requests to add > an explicit amount of extra vertical space, or to move to a specific vertical > position on the page."
As a summary, that shades pretty far into the role of advocacy. But it does
express a complaint that can be evaluated, which beats that ticket's derisive
BS about naïveté and this one's hyperventilating characterization of
"critical" severity.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65077>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
