Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64450 (group groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > I very recently decided against that. > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=78394f9f5bbf22f7505c751c122f5b9c5f174073
That commit adds some flags to nroff, but is silent on why others were decided
against.
It would add a bit of convenience for users to be able to use largely the same
command-line invocation, changing only the first letter of the *roff command.
The grn, grap, and chem preprocessors may not render well in nroff (I've never
used them), but surely subpar rendering is preferable to skipping the
preprocessing entirely.
As comment #1 says, these flags are low priority, but what's the rationale for
rejecting them outright?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64450>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
