Follow-up Comment #7, bug #66054 (group groff): [comment #4 comment #4:] > I won't say this critique is invalid, but it's not something I > have a hankering to overturn for _groff_ 1.24.
Yeah, I'm not even sure how it would be overturned in a way that maintains
compatibility, so this was more a gripe at the original design than a request
for action.
> I think the semantics can be defended if one understands what an
> "equivalence class" is. Doesn't *everyone* take a university
> course in discrete mathematics? ;-)
Perhaps the info manual can summarize the salient points of this course for
those who slept through it. ;-)
Or at least make more explicit what ".hcode a a" means in practical terms.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66054>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
