Follow-up Comment #10, bug #57622 (group groff): Back when this ticket was about fixing a syntax error, before it morphed to an existential question, Ingo opined:
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> If there is value in retaining the file at all, then it is in
> retaining it with as few changes as possible.
Branden countered:
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> My preference would be to re-open the ticket and fix it.
Ingo's desire for it to be a file in amber is already undermined by the
handful of trivial fixes it's garnered over its groff/git lifetime. Fixing
the legitimate syntax error Bjarni pointed out seems to be in line with these
changes.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57622>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
