Follow-up Comment #2, bug #66051 (group groff):

It makes total sense and also seems a duplicate of bug #42870.  I guess I'm
not seeing what's "more modest" about that one.

If anything, the way it's worded, _this_ one seems more modest, as it's asking
for support of only special characters, and only for .hcode, whereas #42870
(per its original submission wording) asks for support of "any characters
entities," for .hw and .hcode.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?66051>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to