Follow-up Comment #2, bug #65693 (group groff):
Given the arguments in favor of the U+00A0 to \~ mapping presented in bug
#58962 and bug #65710, I now wonder if groff might be better off doing
something heretical like ignoring the u00A0 glyph in a font and applying its
own mapping to that character. That is, rather than documenting the exception
to the cited groff_char(7) sentence, make that sentence universally true.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65693>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
