Follow-up Comment #26, bug #64155 (group groff): I guess I wasn't clear enough when I advised not implementing .fam checking as proposed by Branden, as I have just discovered the change has been committed, with the expected consequence: partial families in my library that have only R and I fonts choke on .fam.
printf ".fam Technical\n.ft R" | groff -z troff:<standard input>:1: error: 'Technical' is not a valid font family This is a regression. Please revert the commit that introduced it, 39ffa368dc6a1de4c11cf3f4f5b8594d3c974173. I don't see any need for .fam checking in the first place, but that discussion should be left for after the commit is reverted. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64155> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/