Follow-up Comment #18, bug #60930 (group groff):
[comment #17 comment #17:]
> [comment #16 comment #16:]
> > My suggestion for a name is *fforg*.
>
> Too many letters in common with fontforge, of which it looks
> like an abbreviation.
This was my first mental association on reading the name. But I'm not sure
whether I consider that disqualifying. It _is_ related to font conversions,
akin to a mini-FontForge for a specific domain.
> Also, the name gives no indication of the script's function
> or domain of operation.
This, however, seems entirely consistent with a Unix command-line name space
strewn with inscrutable letter-salads like grep, fsck, ls, cat, gcc, sudo, cd,
chmod, awk, and even groff. And while some groff tools hint at their family
relation (grotty, gropdf, grog), plenty more do not (preconv, chem, addftinfo,
soelim, afmtodit).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60930>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
