Follow-up Comment #4, bug#40963 (group groff): [comment #2 comment #2:] > Heirloom troff maintains AT&T troff's original units (1/36 em) > for its .ss request,
I should scuttle my attempt to spread misinformation. CSTR #54 documented that .ss used 36ths of an em as its unit, but this claim was incorrect for all known AT&T troffs (though Heirloom troff went ahead and made it correct for itself). http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2023-05/msg00060.html and its couple of immediate follow-ups are the posts in a very long thread that best illustrate this. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?40963> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
