Update of bug#64316 (group groff):

              Item Group:          Feature change => Incorrect behaviour    
                 Summary: [mm] WC "FB" and "-FB" arguments appear to be dead
letters => [mm] does not implement DWB mm's ".WC -FB"

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #2:

Bug #64336 is fixed.  So, returning to this...

The following input produces the same output in GNU _nroff_ mode whether the
first line has "FB", "-FB", or is commented out.


.WC -FB
.P
This is my paragraph.
.DF
.TS
L.
This is my big table.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
.TE
.DE
.P
This concludes my paper.


But there is a difference in DWB _nroff_, so this seems like a legit bug. 
".WC FB" is indeed the default behavior, and ".WC -FB" changes the
formatting.


$ diff -u floating-keep-no-WC-FB.txt floating-keep-WC-FB.txt && echo SAME
SAME
$ diff -U1 floating-keep-WC-FB.txt floating-keep-WC-minus-FB.txt
--- floating-keep-WC-FB.txt     2024-01-03 04:18:58.396207730 -0600
+++ floating-keep-WC-minus-FB.txt       2024-01-03 04:18:58.400207719 -0600
@@ -7,4 +7,2 @@
 
-       This is my paragraph.
-
        This is my big table.
@@ -58,2 +56,4 @@
        48
+       49
+       50
 
@@ -73,4 +73,2 @@
 
-       49
-       50
        51
@@ -78,2 +76,4 @@
 
+       This is my paragraph.
+
        This concludes my paper.


It's a neat trick to push material _before_ the float after it.  Is a
diversion involved?  Does DWB _mm_ divert all paragraphs by default??


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64316>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/


Reply via email to