Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64954 (project groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> [comment #0 original submission:]
> > groff.texi:14446: othe ==> other
>
> In context ("in othe opposite order"), this seems more likely to have been
intended to be "the" than "other."
Thanks, Dave. I should have double-checked Bjarni's suggestions, and Bjarni
should have given thought to them before filing the report.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64954>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
