Follow-up Comment #13, bug #63827 (project groff): [comment #11 comment #11:] > [comment #10 comment #10:] > > Should the 1.23 announcement/news mention that: > > * the pdfmark bundled with this release of groff is not the latest code (and provide a pointer to that code)? > > I don't think they've diverged all that much.
Keith addressed this in comment #12; I don't know if that changes the conclusion any. > pdfroff(1) will continue to exist in groff 1.23.0 > distributions and point readers to Keith's site. Ah, yes, I somehow missed [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/commit/?id=948ccc55 commit 948ccc55], even though it was cited in a comment to bug #63133, on which I'm cc:ed. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63827> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
