Follow-up Comment #4, bug #62726 (project groff):
[comment #3 comment #3:]
> Having a stronger `troff` request to sanitize any diversion,
> string, or macro of node data is a feature that I am
> increasingly coming to think is both feasible and desirable.
This has been punted over to bug #62787.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62726>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
