Follow-up Comment #10, bug #61371 (project groff): This change has been disputed: http://lists.gnu.org/r/groff/2021-11/msg00010.html
I don't know whose wording, Bjarni's or Keith's, is more correct here, and no one else on the list has offered an opinion. However, Keith's claim that "decimal separator" is "invalid terminology" is contradicted by Wikipedia's extensive, and extensively annotated, entry for the term <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_separator>, which also says that "radix point" is the more general term used when bases other than 10 are under consideration. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61371> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
