Follow-up Comment #1, bug #58946 (project groff):

Keith posted more discussion germane to this:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2021-07/msg00103.html

In particular, he notes that, while pdfmark functionality was never rolled
into -ms itself, he doesn't believe it _should_ be.  Thus the current -mspdf
may be the preferred solution, and nothing more may need to be done for -ms. 
Keith, is this an accurate synopsis?

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58946>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/


Reply via email to