URL: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57667>
Summary: refer(1) rehab Project: GNU troff Submitted by: None Submitted on: Sun 26 Jan 2020 02:05:54 AM UTC Category: Macro - others Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: Documentation Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: None _______________________________________________________ Details: Peter Schaffter says of refer(1) <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2020-01/msg00024.html>: It's complete and accurate, but communicates its substance poorly to all but the initiated. It would be of enormous help if, at the very least, the SEE ALSO section pointed readers to Lesk's paper so they don't have to plough through the whole manpage only to discover that they're as befuddled and befogged as before, with no clue where to find the kind of helpful information they were seeking. * there's no mention that the mom macros, which have been part of groff for close to twenty years, are suitable for use with refer; * the wording of the preamble to the list of field identifiers creates the impression that they are the only ones available; * there is no mention that the number of reference types can be extended beyond the four that are listed; * sections dealing with accent strings in bibliographic databases need to be updated to state first that accented characters should be entered as named glyphs, reflecting contemporary usage, and only secondarily that accent strings, if preferred, should come after the affected character. Piotr Piatrou adds <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2020-01/msg00027.html>: Take, for instance, groff_mm(1), which can indeed be called ADEQUATE man page because, with all its conciseness, it gave me enough information to start using the mm macros. What was crucial to me, the descriptions of internal strings and registers, and also the interaction with mm of the user-defined macros. This is exactly what a user needs but does not find in refer(1). Namely, what could be added to refer(1): 0 descriptions of internal strings like [A, [B, ... and registers generated by refer, 0 mention of the citations formatting being taken care of by refer-ms.tmac, etc., if one uses the standard macro sets, 0 if one does not use the standard macro sets, there should be a brief description of how a user is to arrange the .[-, ... macros. Maybe a couple of paragraphs, it does not break anything, and should be enough as a newbuy's staring point. I agree that all this information is already scattered among refer(1), refer.tmac and the Lesk's paper. I even agree that the information is kind of ample. I am complaining about the way of its presentation, which DOES NOT work for an average user. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57667> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/