Philip Prindeville via Bug reports for GNU grep <bug-grep@gnu.org>
writes:
> It might be useful to have an argument like --glob-regexp to have a
> file containing globbing patterns to match (or exclude) against a
> stream of filenames.
It seems to me what you want is an argument that causes grep to
interpret patterns as shell "globs" rather than as regexps. (Note that
the glob language is considerably weaker than regexps, and AFAIK they
are never called "regexps".) So a better name would be "--glob".
I can see value in that.
Is there an unambiguous standard for globs? I know that different
shells do globbing somewhat differently. Although I notice that grep
has these options that take glob arguments, so the code in grep must
contain a glob-matcher already, and thus a definition of glob-patterns.
--exclude=GLOB
--exclude-dir=GLOB
--include=GLOB
Dale
