On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Norihiro Tanaka <nori...@kcn.ne.jp> wrote: > Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > >> I suspect this won't be the last word in this area, because it feels >> like we should be able to adjust DFA's tables so that people using >> such locales can retain DFA's efficiency without the bug in the >> current implementation. > > Hi Jim, > > It is a bug in dfa for period expression in non-UTF8 locales. dfa > calculates transition for single byte characters and a multibyte > character separately and merge both results. However, if backs to > an initial state in transition for single byte characters, we should > stop matching single byte characters.
Nice work. Thank you.
