The silence in response to this has been thundering. :-( Ignoring the gawk bits, is the grep team willing to incorporate the dfa.[ch] changes?
Should this wait until after other pending changes to dfa are applied? Thanks, Arnold Aharon Robbins <arn...@skeeve.com> wrote: > Hi. > > Here is my proposed patch for merging the byte to w.c. caches in gawk > by using the one in dfa. > > I renamed the one in dfa to 'btowc_cache' since it caches bytes, > not multibyte characters. This compiles and gets through the test > suite. > > I also changed the check for the return of mbrtowc since it returns > unsigned. > > Thanks, > > Arnold
