On 04/18/2016 07:54 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
I'm sure you intended this additional change, so that the if-expression can sometimes be false:+ if (mbrtowc (&wc, buf, 1, &mbs) >= 0) - if (mbrtowc (&wc, buf, 1, &mbs) < (size_t)-2)
Oh yes. (Blush.) Or it could be <= 1.
with that, the btowc replacement function still declares bytes 128..255 to be invalid in the C locale.
Too bad. I'm afraid someone with access to MirBSD will need to debug it.
