On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > My main qualm is Bug#22461. It'd be OK to issue 'grep' with that bug, I > guess. I wish I had more time to look into it before the release, but on the > other hand if I put in a bugfix now we'd have to test it. It's not a serious > bug, just an annoyance (an extra "Binary file matches" line on input that > does indeed contain binary data and a match, albeit a match that was in text > and was properly reported as text).
Oh! Somehow the email for that bug report did not reach me. I agree that it is not a big deal, but I would rather fix it first, too. Let's see who finds the time first.
