On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gary Johnson <garyj...@spocom.com> wrote: > [...] In short, 2.21.78 > appears _slightly_ slower than 2.21, but not enough (for me) to > worry about.
Thanks for confirming that your performance regression is so small.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Gary Johnson <garyj...@spocom.com> wrote: > [...] In short, 2.21.78 > appears _slightly_ slower than 2.21, but not enough (for me) to > worry about.
Thanks for confirming that your performance regression is so small.