On 2014-09-12 03:24:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Timings with the Debian packages on my personal svn working copy > (binary + text files): > > 2.18-2 0.9s with -P, 0.4s without -P > 2.20-3 11.6s with -P, 0.4s without -P
I've done another test on a large PDF file. Let's forget grep 2.18, which is indeed too buggy (I could reproduce a buffer overflow). But let's compare with pcregrep, using the "zzz" pattern: Debian grep 2.20-3 6.64s (with -P) Upstream grep 2.21 5.39s (with -P) Debian pcregrep 8.35 0.71s In all cases, PCRE is used, but pcregrep is much faster than grep -P. (Note: on this example, "grep" alone is much faster than pcregrep, but this is not related to the invalid encoding, and depending on the pattern, either grep or PCRE can be significantly faster.) So, perhaps that the right method would be to do what pcregrep does, even though "grep -P" can currently be a bit faster than pcregrep in some cases. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
