Norihiro Tanaka <nori...@kcn.ne.jp> wrote: > Sorry, I investigated many cases, but I couldn't find it. > > When this bug is reproduced, must be s == 0 and s1 > 0 and > d->newlines[s] != d->newlines[s1]. In addition, they mustn't be > updated until reaches a next newline. > > I believe that all of them is never filled at the same time. So I think > once I close the bug without fix.
Sorry, I have closed bug#18642 instead of bug#18645 by my mistake. This bug isn't done. Can you re-open it?
