> > > How could we call this module? 'realloc-ee' sounds too synthetic. > > > > How about 'alloc-0-nonnull'? > > > > Whatever the module's name is, it should affect malloc too, as there's > > little point to adjusting realloc without also adjusting malloc. > > A dependency from the new module to 'malloc-gnu' should fit the bill, no? > > Then I would opt for the name 'realloc-0safe', with such a dependency.
Hmm. This module would semantically conflict with 'realloc-gnu', no? Because 'realloc-gnu' mandates that realloc(p,0) behaves in one way, and 'realloc-0safe' mandates that it behaves in another way. I think we need to remove the 'realloc-gnu' module first. This will require changes to the packages: inetutils, liblouis. [1] Bruno [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=realloc-gnu+-path%3Aautomake.mk+-path%3Axmalloc.c+-path%3Arealloc.c+-path%3AChangeLog+-path%3Aconfig.in.h+-path%3Aconfig.hin+-path%3Agnulib.mk+-path%3Amalloc.m4+-path%3AMakefile.gnulib+-path%3Aconfig.h.in+-path%3AMakefile.am+-path%3Agnulib-comp.m4+-path%3Agnulib-cache.m4&literal=1
