Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> writes:
>> that 'return (struct ...) { initializers }'
>> produces particularly good code with modern compilers)
>
> Yeah, that's partly why I weighed in on this seemingly-obscure topic.
> I like the more-functional style and wouldn't want "undefined
> behavior" to get in its way.
It would make things more friendly to -fanalyzer. Thats how I noticed
the uninitialized members previously [1].
Though that is mostly my fault for forgetting -DGCC_LINT or tampering
with CFLAGS directly instead of using --enable-compile-warnings or some
other option that defines it.
Collin
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-05/msg00122.html
