Paul Eggert wrote: > > In the last two years, I got the feeling that clang is adopting new > > ISO C features more quickly than GCC (seen with the K&R prototypes > > removal in clang 16, now with ckd_add in clang 18). > > I don't have that feeling. I would put it differently, since GCC has > supported the ckd_add stuff for some time, and has merely been reluctant > to refuse to support K&R style function definitions (which C23 still > allows as an extension). > > I would instead say that GCC is more willing to support C23 extensions > than Clang is.
Thanks; I stand corrected. So, we can say that clang switches to strict interpretations of C23 sooner than gcc does. This still is a sufficient rationale for doing a CI with the newest released clang. Bruno
