Hi! The Debian gnulib package carry this patch: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gnulib/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/patches/02-shebang.patch?ref_type=heads
Should we apply a patch like the one below to gnulib? /Simon
From e0c2029772b3789ab77884705cea7cb181708df7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:51:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp: Use #!/usr/bin/clisp. Signed-off-by: Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> --- ChangeLog | 4 ++++ lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index abdba4716b..c63827fa64 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2019-10-08 Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> + + * lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp: Use #!/usr/bin/clisp. + 2024-07-01 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> Avoid some possibly wrong configure test results. diff --git a/lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp b/lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp index 1b0c60cf04..15d76019c6 100755 --- a/lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp +++ b/lib/uniname/gen-uninames.lisp @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/usr/local/bin/clisp -C +#!/usr/bin/clisp -C ;;; Creation of gnulib's uninames.h from the UnicodeData.txt table. -- 2.45.2
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
