On 5/17/24 2:10 PM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Since I don't have time to investigate them and, OTOH, I don't want that > the NetBSD test failures mark the entire continuous integration run as > "failed", here are patches to mark them as expected failures.
Seems reasonable. Perhaps it is worth mentioning somewhere that XFAIL may refer to an actual bug that needs investigation? Collin
