Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> writes: > On 2024-04-27 15:17, Sam James wrote: >> Someone might read this and wrongly think that "GCC 14" >> is broken. >> I'd just omit 14 here. > > Good point as I think some of these bugs are also in GCC 13.x for some > value of x. > > I installed the attached. It's not quite what you asked for but I hope > it addresses the issue. >
WFM, cheers paul! > [2. text/x-patch; 0001-maint-be-more-precise-and-vague-about-GCC-14.patch]...
