Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> writes: > Hi, > > It's now time to call for beta-testers of the Python gnulib-tool. > I plan to post the same text to info-gnu and to planet.gnu.org.
Confirmed success with oath-toolkit; identical generated files. Old execution time was ~48 seconds, now it is at 0.7 seconds. The slow gnulib-tool runtime was the primary reason for putting gnulib generated files into git for oath-toolkit. Waiting close to a minute for a fresh rebuild became unbearable during development cycles, and this is not on the slowest of machines (i7-1260P, 64GB RAM, Samsung SSD 990 PRO). Now I can experiment with removing gnulib files from version control again. jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ time make -f cfg.mk ... real 0m48,169s user 0m49,900s sys 0m9,658s jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ export GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=py jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ time make -f cfg.mk ... real 0m0,704s user 0m0,527s sys 0m0,179s jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ In case you doubt this was due to a caching speedup, here is another invocation right after the previous python run: jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ export GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=sh jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ time make -f cfg.mk ... real 0m49,414s user 0m50,742s sys 0m10,332s jas@kaka:~/src/oath-toolkit$ Thank you so much, /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
