Collin Funk wrote: > Okay, here is a patch to make sure I am understanding correctly.
Thanks, applied! > Thanks > for the help. The GNU ChangeLog stuff is new too me. I left the commit > message without a part number. I wasn't sure if you wanted to continue > them/restart since all of them are your patches from ~2 years ago. I added the part number, since it gives us a certain feeling of how far we have gotten along. Also, I copy&pasted the date+author line from the ChangeLog; the 'git log' contains the same data with slightly different formatting. > The GNU ChangeLog stuff is new too me. You can exploit 80 columns, in the ChangeLog, including the leading tab. No need to restrict yourself to 72 columns here. Bruno
