On Sat, 11 Feb 2023 at 08:48, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > I got the impression that without a .x file, the NAME section of the output > is too silly. > > This is correct, but although (as you observe) this means that some documentation goes in the Makefile.am, it avoids repeating the name of the package.
Hmm, I guess I should have a foo.x.in that uses @PACKAGE@ instead. -- https://rrt.sc3d.org
