Thanks for fixing it so quickly. On 2023-02-05 19:27, Bruno Haible wrote:
+# ifdef __cplusplus +/* For the C++ compiler the result of the configure test is irrelevant. + We know that at least g++ and clang with option -std=c++11 or higher, as well + as MSVC 14 or newer, already have nullptr. */ +# if !(((defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__) && __cplusplus >= 201103L) \ + || (defined _MSC_VER && 1900 <= _MSC_VER))
<https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/nullptr> says nullptr is part of C++11, so would it be better to omit the "(defined __GNUC__ || defined __clang__) && "? It seems unlikely that a compiler would advertise conformance to C++11 without supporting nullptr.
