Paul Eggert wrote: > I ... wouldn't object to a very short transition period
Short transition periods tend to cause unnecessary hassle to some users. I therefore favour 1 year or 2 years as a transition period. > since the current #warning is something I would treat > like a diagnostic that getprogname.h is missing. I don't understand. Is the #warning that I added misleading? Then, by all means, please provide a better message. (The compiler typically reports the location of the warning; so, from the compiler's diagnostic it should be clear that there still is a getprogname.h. No?) Bruno
