On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 10:29:22PM +0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > As agreed upon in the thread starting at > <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-05/msg00102.html>. > >
> +++ b/doc/gnulib-intro.texi > @@ -455,15 +455,22 @@ proofreading the patch. > @section Copyright > > Most modules are under the GPL@. Some, mostly modules which can > -reasonably be used in libraries, are under LGPL@. The source files > -always say "GPL", but the real license specification is in the module > -description file. If the module description file says "GPL", it means > -"GPLv3+" (GPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice); if it says "LGPL", > -it means "LGPLv3+" (LGPLv3 or newer, at the licensee's choice). > +reasonably be used in libraries, are under LGPL@. Few modules are > +under other licenses, such as LGPLv2+, unlimited, or public domain. Would read better as "A few modules are..." -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
