Thanks for your reply! On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 9:42 AM Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
> On 4/11/21 10:19 PM, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > which of the reports do you consider as > > false positives and which as real issues ? If there are some real > > issues, are you willing to fix them ? > > Every report is a false positive. I assume you're talking about the > reports here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-gnulib/2021-04/msg00096.html > > The utimens.c false positives are apparently due to a confusing but > technically-valid use of pointers, which I fixed in Gnulib here: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=a3a946f670718d0dee5a7425ad5ac0a29fb46ea1 > > No other fixes should be needed. > >