On Monday, 22 March 2021 16:28:57 CET John David Anglin wrote: > On 2021-03-22 10:37 a.m., Jim Meyering wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 6:09 AM Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > >> I would like to use the module 'clean-temp' and, with it, the modules > >> 'error' > >> and 'getprogname' in a library under GPLv2+ (namely, GNU libffcall) and in > >> a > >> gnulib module for JIT support. > >> > >> To this effect, I would like to ask for your permission to relicense these > >> modules (error and getprogname) from LGPLv3+ to LGPLv2+. > >> > >> The lib/error.c code is based on the one in glibc (LGPLv2+). Here we would > >> need > >> the approval of > >> Pino Toscano > >> for > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=f29814b96c9737abc8193d57d630697700feebeb > >> Paul Eggert > >> for > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=aad5573e2e307ba42eea5b6b76b0b9788a5eaaec > >> > >> For lib/getprogname.c we would need the approval of > >> Pino Toscano > >> Paul Eggert > >> Jim Meyering > >> Gisle Vanem > >> Daniel Richard G > >> John David Anglin > >> Benji Wiebe > >> > >> To give your approval, please reply with the mailing list in CC. > > Fine with me to relicense. > Same here.
I agree with the relicensing to LGPLv2+. It actually was my original intention (that's why I created a new module), apparently missing the important fact that the unversioned "LGPL" means "v3+". Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
