On 3/8/20 5:11 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
it would
make sense for gnulib to have "nearly POSIX" compliant variants of these
functions; this would remove the need for the gnulib*printf*  code in
many cases.
this sounds like a good idea.
Paul, Eric, what's your opinion on this?

Might be helpful for programs that don't want to use %n.

Perhaps also there should be some way to tell glibc "Hey, I want to use %n even though I want the other fortification features." That'd be an improvement over what we have now. For what it's worth, GNU Emacs (which I happen to be working on right now) uses %n.

Reply via email to