Hi Akim, > Note that the hash module claims LGPLv2+, but the header of hash.[ch] is > about GPLv3+.
This is explained here: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Gnulib-licensing.html The gnulib-tool option --lgpl=2 will put LGPLv2+ headers on the files, for people who use the modules to build an LGPLv2+ package. > Thanks for the hint; below is my updated proposal (which passes its test :). Looks perfect. > Also, contrary to the case of xconcat-filename, I have not put hash.h in the > Files of xhash, because I see hash.h as a part of hash, not xhash. Either way is fine. > And I shamelessly decided to put the maintenance burden on Jim's shoulders. Don't be shy :) Bruno
