Eric Blake wrote: > +#if SOCK_CLOEXEC > + if (flags & SOCK_NONBLOCK)
Why '#if SOCK_CLOEXEC'? Why not '#if SOCK_NONBLOCK'? Bruno
- [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if defined Eric Blake
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if def... Eric Blake
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if... Bruno Haible
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if def... Richard W.M. Jones
- Re: [PATCH] accept4: Support SOCK_NONBLOCK, if def... Bruno Haible
